Client X hired you for only two reasons Bill. You told him that you had worked 5 extradition cases in the past and because of your RCMP and courtroom “connections” you were able to win stays for 2 of them. (You knew this was a lie, but X had no way to know the truth – that you only had one extradition case where you persuaded your client “Cashbreath” to voluntarily surrender himself and abandon his extradition fight – AFTER you collected your fees) This is like a painter collecting money to paint a house and then after collecting the money, tells the owner that a paint job could wait another year or two. The other reason you were selected by Client X is because as per the sworn statements of eye witnesses Arnold, Sanchez, Stone, and X contained in the Law Society complaint, you agreed to work for a flat fee and accept monthly payments. This is well documented in the Law Society complaint filed against you by Client X. See http://bruceslawsocietycomplaints.wordpress.com (Exhibits Sections)
Although it took you a few months to explain your real “RCMP connections”, while intoxicated, you originally came across as mostly believable to X and all your talk about hiring a private investigator, getting a polygraph test arranged, and getting a video deposition from Canadian John Pierre Gonyou and an affidavit from Ty West and Michael Mansfield made X believe you were passionate about his case, especially after you sent that video tape of the corrupt FBI Agent Terry Neslon to FBI Director Mueller, and Senators Clinton and Biden. Surely they would want to know that a corrupt FBI agent was smuggling or $1Billion of drugs (street value) every year into Canada. You were talking a great game, but strangely you changed your attitude after the 4 agents came to visit and you took your sudden holiday to Florida. See the exhibits in the Law Society complaint for a copy http://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.wordpress.com. When you were in Florida you were instructed by your client to pick up his legal files from Attorney Arnoldo Velez in Miami (Coral Gables) which contained a copy of his contract with American Financial Group since one of the FBI agents was trying to deny that he worked there for two years. Although you agreed to do so, you later said you “forgot”. Eventually Client X proceeding pro-se would get the statement from Mansfield and files from Atty. Velez. Although you did get the statement from Ty West (CBS News Investigator), you got it AFTER the extradition hearing when it became inadmissible even though he offered to cooperate 6 weeks before the extradition hearing. Some people say the ball was dropped deliberately, while others say it was common negligence. Either way, the damage done to Client X was the same.
When you were contacted by reporters from the New York Times, Toronto Sun, USA Today, and Ottawa Citizen, it took you over a month to tell Client X about the interview requests – why? Then when he asked you for the names and numbers of the reporters, you claim you did not keep them because YOU “made a decision not to talk with the media”, although you did manage to give your own statement to Tom Godfrey at the Toronto Sun without the knowledge nor consent of your client. Client X would later receive this letter from Ottawa Citizen reporter Paul McKay in 2003…
No polygraph exam nor private investigator materialized even though you were collecting your payments from X every month. You suddenly “misplaced” the handwritten letter received by X from Canadian John Pierre Gonyou confirming what took place offshore with the unregistered Enron shares, and that X’s role was only as an introducing party between buyer and seller. You also manage to misplace the original death threat note found on X’s family car that had fingerprints on it. Why did you give the police a copy and not the original Bill? https://pierregonyou.wordpress.com/category/john-pierre-gonyou/ Even though Gonyou agreed to give a video deposition, you kept postponing the date (3 times) and then word came that Pierre suddenly died of an ostensible “drug overdose” (someone shot him up with enough heroin to kill King Kong).
You also manage to forget your pledge to document the previous torture sustained by Client X the last time he was in custody or the requesting state and how they once even tried to frame him for an attempted murder in Florida and were foiled by 5 alibi witnesses in the Everglades, 4 of whom were complete strangers.You are also given a copy of the report Client X filed with Amnesty International in Toronto only a few days before his Mississauga home was stormed and he was arrested. You vow to get a sworn declaration from Bonnie, Savannah, and Nancy Cameron, but you put that on the back burner as you are assured your Client X has zero chance of remaining in Canada. https://afewthoughtsfrombruce.wordpress.com/2014/07/29/american-citizens-are-tortured-on-american-soil-for-years-an-shameful-fact/
You probably figured out that that nothing you did or didn’t do would change the sealed fate of your Client X Bill, but you kept accepting monthly payments. When X instructed you to return the check received from Mikhail, the Russian mobster that the Canadian and American feds insisted was behind the death threats and the murder of Al Chalem, you ignored him and deposited the money into your account. Then you even called the godfather of Client X’s son to solicit more money without even telling X. Is this ethical in your judgment? Refer to the sworn statement of Charles Arnold in the Law Society complaint.
Then your client gives you some “great news”. He met with MP Paul Szabo who after seeing the Nelson video, believes there is foul play involved and offers to help. The MP wants to meet with you to review the files and offer some suggestions. Strangely you say you are “too busy” and refuse to meet with MP Szabo. Why?
Sensing the end was near you began getting desperate for more money and started contacting victims of American Financial Group trying to sell the confidential legal files/statements of Client X without his knowledge nor consent. Eventually Client X will learn the truth about this after he receives the below fax from Atty.Luis Konski in Florida, but by then he has already terminated your services.
Today while you enjoy the good life in Ontario, Client X is stuck exiled in China, separated from his wife and children for six years due to one of your most dirty tricks. And although it was a clever move to keep the two witnesses whose testimony could get you imprisoned and disbarred, both are willing to be deposed under oath and pass a polygraph test. So far the Law Society has covered for you, but eventually the truth will find its way to the surface. http://whyunclesamhatesbruce.blogspot.com
TO BE CONTINUED…
The above comments are solely those of the author and he speaks for no other third party. The above is factual information related to case no E-19-00 in the Superior Court of Ontario. All comments above are submitted in accordance with the freedom of speech provision of the Charter Rights without prejudice nor malice in the interests of true justice, legal reform, and public awareness. Details of these matters can be found in the actual complaint filed with the law society at http://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.wordpress.com. Like 95% of all law society complaints, this one was also dismissed, but not a single 1 of 19 eye and/or expert witnesses were every contacted/interviewed by the Law Society and the victim was never provided the name of the investigator (if there really was one) nor a copy of any related report, nor instructions on how to appeal the decision to dismiss. The exhibits in the above complaint speak for themselves. The author attempted to file a police report against solicitor William Gilmour in 2008 but the Peel Police Department whom he represents refused to process it. Background on Client X can be found at http://whyunclesamhatesbruce.blogspot.com To see how the Law Society handled/mishandled the complaint against this solicitor you can visit this link below. There is no way of knowing how many other people have filed complaints against Mr. Gilmour because the Law Society simply won’t tell you. http://lawsocietyofuppercanada.wordpress.com
Dishonest And Unethical Lawyers 