Solicitor William Gilmour Reviews – He is dishonest with Panama Bank Account – Why?

 

biker_bill

He has had the account since 2004 yet he has NEVER had a single client in Panama. But since he went to meet with Terry Nelson and Stephen Finta in Panama (where they do their drug dealing banking) it can be safely assumed that is where he was paid off to sabotage Bruce Gorcyca’s extradition case.  What?  Just Google “Whistle Blower Bruce Gorcyca” and read.

Gilmour was himself arrested on August 14th, 2001 and arraigned at the Tom Davis Courthouse in Brampton. The charge was child abuse.  But because he represents the Peel Regional Police, he managed to get the court file sealed and adjudication withheld after he agreed to turn in his firearms and undergo anger management counseling.

Gilmour had other issues at the time, but no need to go into them here. His past is very much worth exploring however. He was asked to resign from the RCMP after he shot an unarmed teen in the back and he had an affair with the wife of an RCMP colleague and she became a murder victim. Her name was Jeanette Kelly.

Gilmour “coincidentally” represented an eye witness to the Terry Nelson – Mike Huxtable – Pierre Jeanette drug ring of Canada named Erling Ingvaldsen. Author Rodney Stich can tell you about Erling. Gilmour made it impossible for both Erling and Gorcyca to return to Canada where they could both testify against the smugglers and get a dozen government officials convicted and imprisoned.  Gilmour clearly did a good job in protecting Nelson, Huxtable, & Jeanette (as well as himself from prosecution).  If you are corrupt official in need of a lawyer, Gilmour is your go to guy!

Part 2 – The Solicitor William Gilmour Lawyer Saga Continues In Brampton, Ontario. Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel? You decide.

Dumb-911-calls---Man-in-handcuffs-generic-jpg

Today was a very bad day for you Bill Gilmour. Someone reported you for punching your 10 year old son in a mall parking lot and the police have arrived. Even though you explain that you represent the Peel Police department, and you just got their Chief acquitted of a contempt charge and working to get their colleagues acquitted of police brutality charges, the crowd insists that you be arrested. After all your son is less than half your size and weight. In fact you are a giant guy of 6’2” and 260 pounds at the time and can barely fit in the police car after they put handcuffs on you and take you to the police station jail to be processed. Child services is called to interview your son. Yes, August 14th, 2001 was a very bad day for Bill Gilmour who claims to be “the best connected criminal defense attorney in Toronto.”

But when you get to the station you ask to see a friend who gives you some advice and calms you down. You are just hoping this does not get to crime reporters at the Toronto Sun or you will lose half of your clients for sure. You will need a lawyer who the Brampton judges all know and like. You know them all yourself, but not all of them are your friends. You choose the right solicitor and he knows the schedule of the judges and knows how to shop for the right one.

TopSecret1

Meanwhile client X is wondering where you are. You had an appointment with him and you did not show up. You decide not to tell anyone about your arrest unless they mention they heard about it first. Surely X will have no way to know – he is still in maximum security lockdown after just receiving news the American government issued an extradition warrant but no indictment or charging documents.

biker_billThe police release you on your own recognizance and you immediately instruct your lawyer to work out a quick plea agreement to keep child services from filing more charges against you or opening an investigation. You are lucky to get seen by the right judge – a very good friend of your lawyer and you agree to get anger management counseling and surrender your firearms to the police if the adjudication is withheld and the court filed is sealed. The arrest record will still show up, but you figure nobody will ever know about it. You dodged a career-ending bullet. Now you won’t have to move to Windsor to start a new life after all. One day you will regret drinking too much and confessing all of the above along with your affair with a murder victim named Jeanette Kelly, and plans to cheat another client (Vic Richards) out of his patent worth over $20,000,000 to Client X. For now you are wondering how the FBI found out about your arrest and why they are calling you.  (Note: Vic Richards owns Big Brute Motorcycles in Mississauga)

In January of 2001, you arrange for a meeting with the FBI to meet Client X because you claimed they agreed to “make a deal” that would guarantee the freedom and protection of Client X if the feds got the information about murder victim Al Chalem that they wanted. You agree to record the 2 days of meetngs, but when 4 agents show up at Metro West Detention Center instead of the two you were expecting, you are called outside of the meeting room and talk privately with one of the agents after Client X already signed a proffer agreement that you said you would also sign as a witness. But after your private discussion with the FBI guy, you realize that if you remain as a witness, you will no longer be allowed to legally represent X and your billing (income) would come to an end. Perhaps the FBI didn’t want you present anyway. You decide to leave and scratch your name off of the proffer agreement. Ethics be damned – money is more important to you. You left your client alone with the interrogators and even took your digital recorder with you!

09shane.xlarge1

You finally get around to visiting X and do not mention your “bad day at the office”. But by now you learned that X used Solicitor Marshal Drukarsh for the extradition bail hearings you promised the FBI you would be “unavailable” for. Madame Justice Garton is confused why Client X has a criminal attorney yet his Immigration lawyer is handling the bail hearings that set a record – 4 days of hearings. Luckily, Drukarsh was astute and identified 3 lies made by the Crown’s chief witness, a Toronto cop that finally admitted, all of his information was “second-hand” and originating from a single FBI agent who refused to come to Toronto and testify under oath. Client X was granted bail, yet he was still not released from maximum security custody. Days, and then weeks passed, and YOUR client X was still jailed. You told client X that his detention was an Immigration matter and you could do nothing.

But then you were informed by Client X that Immigration Canada Adjudicator William Willoughby decided that Client X was wrongly detained and issued him a “Voluntary Departure Order”. Yet days and weeks later he was still detained and demanding that you file a writ of habeas corpus. Tom Godfrey from the Toronto Sun and the New York Times called you to arrange an interview with Client X but you do nothing to arrange the interviews. Why? Client X was told to “voluntarily depart” Canada and Madame Justice Garton already granted bail weeks ago. Client X instructs you to file a writ of habeas corpus. Instead of following his instructions as the Code of Ethics and professional procedure dictates, you reply to X with this remark “There is no point in filing a habeas motion that no judge will agree to hear.” But yet you have the audacity to ask him for another payment.

patrick

Client X now senses there is something wrong with you and files his own hand-written pro-se habeas corpus and sends it to the clerk of Superior Court. Within ten days Client X is standing before Chief Justice Patrick LeSage. The duty counsel and X wife are present along with the court reporter and a handful of law students. Client X is allowed to tell his story and mention his whistle-blowing history as a U.S. government law enforcement official and employee of American Financial Group. The judge indulges X and even hears about the murders of Al Chalem, Pierre Gonyou, Cliff Baxter, and Scotty Galin.   After one hour, the Judge has only three questions for the Crown…

  1. Did this man make any false statements just now before me?
  2. Do you have any charges pending in Canada or any indictment against this man?
  3. Why is he being jailed at this time?

The first two questions were answered with two “No”s and the Crown’s reply to the last question was “I really don’t know.” Your client X offered to take a polygraph exam to the Chief Justice who replied “That won’t be necessary. I have read your motion and your exhibits and have no reason to disbelieve you. I will look into this situation tomorrow and I will continue this matter until next week. Hopefully we will not have to meet again.”

Within five days Client X, without any assistance from you Solicitor Gilmour was finally released from 10.5 months of illegal maximum security detention after suddenly getting an “Emergency Hearing” from Immigration Canada. At least Chief Justice Lesage is a man of integrity.

To Be Continued…

 

The above comments are solely those of the author and he speaks for no other third party. The above is factual information related to case no E-19-00 in the Superior Court of Ontario. All comments above are submitted in accordance with the freedom of speech provision of the Charter Rights without prejudice nor malice in the interests of true justice, legal reform, and public awareness. Details of these matters can be found in the actual complaint filed with the law society at http://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.wordpress.com. Like 95% of all law society complaints, this one was also dismissed, but not a single 1 of 19 eye and/or expert witnesses were ever contacted/interviewed by the Law Society and the victim was never provided the name of the investigator (if there really was one) nor a copy of any related report, nor instructions on how to appeal the decision to dismiss. The exhibits in the above complaint speak for themselves. The author attempted to file a police report against solicitor William Gilmour in 2008 but the Peel Police Department whom he represents refused to process it. Background on Client X can be found at http://whyunclesamhatesbruce.blogspot.com To see how the Law Society handled/mishandled the complaint against this solicitor you can visit this link below. There is no way of knowing how many other people have filed complaints against Mr. Gilmour because the Law Society simply won’t tell you. http://lawsocietyofuppercanada.wordpress.com

Under-the-table transactions...

An Ugly Experience With Solicitor William Bill Gilmour of Brampton, Ontario – Part 1

cropped-unethical-attorney.jpg

Imagine you are a lawyer in Canada representing an American accused of stock fraud being sought for extradition. You assume the case must involve millions of dollars and that your client has his money secreted offshore or in bearer bonds with his only blood relative still alive – his wife. You learn that he has three homes and from lawyering for only 5 years you know that most extraditions are a rubber stamp affair. In your mind this guy will be locked away for 10-15 years and you have the opportunity to milk him financially in the interim, especially after you learn the Russian mob has already killed one of his business associates and your new client came to Canada with his Canadian wife and infant son to avoid death threats they were getting in America. Your client Mr. X is a former government agent and informant, just like his dead associate. You assume the Russian hit men will track him to Canada and you will not have to do much work on an actual case. His fate is sealed in your mind. It is only a matter of time before he is either killed – or extradited. Monetarily, a “win-win” situation for you.

The longer you keep him in Canada the longer you can bill him and use his business contacts. You learn that his bogus 10 month immigration hold in maximum security is just a ruse “requested” from the American feds designed to break your client’s will so he will voluntarily return to America and “cooperate” the same way his associate Alain Chalem cooperated – and was found with five bullets in his head less than two years ago. https://norealmystery.wordpress.com/2013/12/03/is-enron-links-the-only-reason-thebrutal-slaying-of-this-fbi-informant-remains-unsolved-after-15-years-you-decide/

Wolf_in_Sheep_s_Clothing_by_Inkthinker

When you discover that your client has no criminal charges filed against him in Canada nor America, and that his wife and son are both Canadian citizens and that he entered Canada legally under his own name and he is still being locked up. You know something is very wrong, especially when you learn from Marshal Drukarsh how your client was arrested – by a swat team and an American observer who told all the police – “Nobody touch or talk to him – only the immigration Canada guy”. Drukarsh then tells you that all of his immigration hearings that are supposed to be public have been secret closed door affairs where even his own wife and witnesses cannot attend. You even start to wonder if your new client is a terrorist?!?

If you are going to make money from this guy you have to move quickly because he may never breathe free air again or be “rendered” to another country out of your reach. You visit him after two months and tell him a few lies that you figure he could never disprove and one of them is that your non-existent private investigator just discovered that his wife may be having an affair with a Korean man, and you worry that they may flee to Korea because there is talk that your wife will soon be arrested to put pressure on you “to cooperate”. Your client is now alarmed and worried – just as you wanted him to be. You want to be his life-line, his only hope. So far, he is sucking up your BS and getting much more than worried. You smile.

greedy-man-300x199You wait a few days and then send one of your young new intern lawyers to visit client X with a financial POA you want him to sign. It says that you will be authorized to handle and liquidate any and all of his assets including stocks, bonds, and bank accounts in his best interests. What you don’t know is that client x was just warned about hiring you from another lawyer who has told your client the truth about one of your lies. Client X politely declines to sign your financial POA. Your client who is isolated in maximum security lock-down for almost three months is now confused about you. What does this other lawyer know about you? Maybe it is what you deliberately did not tell your client about your RCMP history?

You decide to send in another, more experienced and veteran lawyer associate named Chris H. who previously employed as a cop, was able to talk people into doing things they did not want to do. Indeed Lawyer Chris did a great PR job on your behalf and tells your client how “connected” you are with the judges and RCMP and confirms that you used to work for the RCMP and you were definitely the right choice of lawyers. Once he has client X believing this he pulls out that financial POA and again client X is asked to sign it. But client X says he never discussed this agreement with you, and therefore again refuses to sign off.

pinocchio-nose

Finally you decide to visit X and get what you want – access to his millions. At your visit you sense he is vulnerable and anxious. You seize this moment to go for the jugular. You tell him yet another lie but this one he will never be able to confirm from jail. You tell him that your private investigator confirmed his wife is in fact sleeping with that Korean guy and he was followed to a travel agency after leaving a hotel with your wife. Client X asks to see photographs. You tell him you will bring them on your next visit but right now, time is critical. You insist that he signs the Power of Attorney now because they could be gone in a day or two with his fortune. Just as you think he believes you and takes the pen you offer him to sign, he looks at you and asks a single question. “What is his name?”

biker_billYou are caught off guard, and you delay too long with an answer you don’t have. After all if you really did hire a PI you would have a name for this Korean lover. He then asks you what kind of car the Korean guy drives. There is awkward silence, but then he helps you out a bit. “Is it Andy?” You breathe a sigh of relief and smirk inside as you just nod your head. You are great actor if nothing else. X seems crushed and tears fill his eyes. You are sure he will now sign your POA Instead he tells you that his wife does not know where he buried the paperwork. She may run off with Andy but not with his assets. Now you too are crushed, but not as much as you will be when X hires his own P.I. and learns the truth about you and you learn there never were any “millions” to begin with.

TO  BE  CONTINUED…

The above comments are solely those of the author and he speaks for no other third party. The above is factual information related to case no E-19-00 in the Superior Court of Ontario. All comments above are submitted in accordance with the freedom of speech provision of the Charter Rights without prejudice nor malice in the interests of true justice, legal reform, and public awareness. Details of these matters can be found in the actual complaint filed with the law society at http://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.wordpress.com. Like 95% of all law society complaints, this one was also dismissed, but not a single 1 of 19 eye and/or expert witnesses were ever contacted/interviewed by the Law Society and the victim was never provided the name of the investigator (if there really was one) nor a copy of any related report, nor instructions on how to appeal the decision to dismiss. The exhibits in the above complaint speak for themselves-including an 11 page sworn report from Private investigator Ed Reiken and an a letter from an investigative reporter. The author attempted to file a police report against solicitor William Gilmour in 2008 but the Peel Police Department whom he represents refused to process it. Background on Client X can be found at http://whyunclesamhatesbruce.blogspot.com

 

bus11