The final stab in the back of Client X by his former lawyer William Gilmour is perhaps the most painful. Although there is no way to prove the following theory without a polygraph test, of both Gilmour and Client X, it is submitted for consideration that Gilmour’s lack of legal competence or deliberate design sabotaged the extradition defense of his client X, in a way that would benefit his wallet, not only through the fraudulent billing but the acquisition of his client’s former childhood home, $50,000 doll collection owned by his mother, but also by what he found in the two safes in the Ohio home. The prejudice to his client’s case caused by his acts and omissions was irreversible and ultimately caused Client X to seek temporary sanctuary in China, that he converted to a permanent ban from Canada. How did Gilmour accomplish this and why?
At one time Clent X and Gilmour were good friends that attempted a couple of business ventures together and had even contemplated an almost-legal multi-million venture together overseas using the contacts of X. When X finally won his freedom and before tension arose over the extortion attempt, there was a window of perhaps nine months where the two men confided in each other. They dined and drank together at a local strip joint and visited Big Brute Motorcycles, a company which was going to make them wealthy. It was during this time that X was with Gilmour when he had to surrender his firearms to the police as part of his plea bargain following his arrest for child abuse. It was also during this period when Gilmour had lunch with X at a Sushi restaurant on Richmond Avenue in Toronto and had too many double martinis and confessed many of his past illegal activities while employed as both a police officer and RCMP officer. The confession arose due the nature of the conversation between the two men about the plea bargain system that let guilty people walk free and innocent people get locked away for crimes they did not commit. Both men shared their first hand knowledge of this fact.
This conversation lasted for more than 2 hours, and during this time was when Gilmour admitted his past life as an undercover narcotics cop and RCMP Mountie and how he accidentally shot an unarmed teen in the back in a remote part of Canada (X seems to recall that it was either Yellowknife or Whitehorse, or some equally remote location) He also talked about his free access to drugs, massive corruption, and an affair he had with a murder victim named Jeanette Kelly. Before this time, client X never heard about the Patrick Kelly case since he was working as a regional marketing manager for a Fortune 500 company far away in Miami at the time.
During this drunken conversation Gilmour admitted committing some serious crimes that he really should have kept to himself. But words once spoken, are like bullets fired from a gun. Neither can be taken back. Although this conversation made Client X uneasy about his lawyer, he had no choice at the time to keep him since had had no extra funds to hire a new attorney. He decided he would keep Gilmour’s secrets to himself as the crimes confessed were over 15 years old. One thing is certain… Patrick Kelly was telling the truth all along. He did NOT murder his wife. Gilmour had inside knowledge and claimed he was “close personal friends with the real killer – all my life”. Eventually, Client X would write a letter to Kelly in prison relating to this conversation after learning that key prosecution witness Dawn Taber had recanted her “eye witness” account of the murder that put Kelly in prison for 20 plus years. See: http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=a10691d7-d9cf-47f2-ae47-eb66920bddd6
But when you fast forward to 2004 when tensions between the two men were high, those past sins were brought up in the heat of an argument and Gilmour flat out threatened to kill Client X or his family if those sins were ever revealed. Seeing Gilmour’s close connections with the Peel Police and those at Tom Davis Courthouse X decided he would remain silent, especially since he had no witnesses nor recordings of what was said at that Sushi restaurant. Suffice it to say that some of what he confessed would get Gilmour locked away for more than 10 years in prison if ever proven in a court of law.
As explained in detail at the link below, after Client X’s charges were dismissed in America and he returned to his family in Canada in December of 2007 his first order of business was to appeal the dismissal of the Law Society Complaint and file an a criminal complaint for extortion against Gilmour with the police, He decided to do it right after the holidays in 2008. But the Law Society refused to advise him how to appeal the decision, and a young rookie cop at the Peel Police station was not allowed to process the criminal complaint by a duty sergeant who was not ashamed to say he was a friend of Gilmour’s.
If your remember from Part 2 of this series, Gilmour had a private talk with the visiting FBI agent, and soon after made a sudden trip to Florida (where both Atty. Stephen Finta and corrupt FBI agent Terry Nelson resided) It was learned that Gilmour also made a visit to Panama where he had no legitimate clients, and it is Panama where Finta and Nelson did much of their secret banking. You can connect your own dots, Read http://whyunclesamhatesbruce.blogspot.com to understand this photo below and how Client X was forced to leave Canada and take what was supposed to be a 3-6 month round-trip to China.
While Client X was in China, Gilmour devised a clever plan to keep his secrets safe in China and avoid a sure assessment hearing, law suit, and possible criminal prosecution when X returned to his family in Canada. He would use his buddies at the Peel Police department who would not even know they were being used. He filed a false police report claiming that Client X called him from China to threaten his life in 2010. In Canada any person who threatens the life of another commits a felony crime and a foreigner who does so is not admissible to enter Canada! Only a lawyer would know about such a law, and Gilmour used it to keep a potential witness and certain litigation out of Canada. His brilliant strategy has kept Client X and his wife and 2 children separated since the false police report was made. As always, Client X offers to take a polygraph to prove this “death threat” was fabricated by Gilmour.
Thus concludes the short version outlining the legal skills and personal character of Solicitor Gilmour (assuming you read Parts 1-5.) as experienced by Client X. Hopeflly not all of his clients had similar problems. He is welcome to rebut and in the past he has relied on partners of his own law firm to lie for him, although one of those partners refused to do so and apologized to Client X for the misconduct of Gilmour. See part V about David Dash who coincidentally, helped X’s wife with the closing on her home when we first moved to Canada. Dash advised X that he was doing everything possible to remove Gilmour from the firm. Apparently he succeeded because Gilmour left a few years back following the Revenue Canada audit he caused with his billing fraud.
Client X is still stranded in China hoping someone in the world will care enough about genuine justice and help reunite his family. He has been married to his Canadian wife for 17 years and their two young sons would like their father back home with them in Canada. Client X still offers to take and pass a polygraph. In the past 4 RCMP officials and two Immigration Canada officials, along with Solicitor Marshal Drukarsh have validated his truthfulness and some of these officials did so while being recorded.
The above comments are solely those of the author and he speaks for no other third party. The above is factual information related to case no E-19-00 in the Superior Court of Ontario. All comments above are submitted in accordance with the freedom of speech provision of the Charter Rights without prejudice nor malice in the interests of true justice, legal reform, and public awareness. Details of these matters can be found in the actual complaint filed with the law society at http://bruceslawsocietycomplaint.wordpress.com. Like 95% of all law society complaints, this one was also dismissed, but not a single 1 of 19 eye and/or expert witnesses were every contacted/interviewed by the Law Society and the victim was never provided the name of the investigator (if there really was one) nor a copy of any related report, nor instructions on how to appeal the decision to dismiss. The exhibits in the above complaint speak for themselves. The author attempted to file a police report against solicitor William Gilmour in 2008 but the Peel Police Department whom he represents refused to process it. Background on Client X can be found at http://whyunclesamhatesbruce.blogspot.com To see how the Law Society handled/mishandled the complaint against this solicitor you can visit this link below. There is no way of knowing how many other people have filed complaints against Mr. Gilmour because the Law Society simply won’t tell you. http://lawsocietyofuppercanada.wordpress.com
Dishonest And Unethical Lawyers 